22 year old woman beaten up at Belgian festival by migrant men

What would you do if four men hit on you at a music festival? If you said 'ignore them', then you are in for a beating.

Sceptr reports on a 22 year old woman who received exactly that sort of treatment when she declined to recognize the romantic overtures of four brown skinned foreign males at a festival in Belgium.

During the Gentse Feesten on Monday afternoon, 22-year-old Noa Cornaer fell victim to pointless violence.

Oh, it wasn't pointless. The foreign men had a reason - their culture.

The young woman was approached by four young men of foreign origin, she confirms to SCEPTR. When she ignored the immigrant young men, she was called a whore and beaten up. 

The immigrant young men started calling after the young woman. "Nice girl, come," they said. “When I ignored them, they suddenly broke up with me. Because I didn't respond to that, they started calling out 'whore' and 'slut'. Before I realized it correctly, they attacked me in the back. I was pushed and hit the ground. They did not know when to stop and continued to hit my face. "

Because that's what you do when a whore doesn't respect you. Still think third world migrants are just the same as us?

Noa lost consciousness, and when she awoke she noticed the perpetrators had gone off with her handbag. She suffered a concussion and various bruises. 

The day after the facts, Noa went to the police to file a complaint. They started an investigation, but there is currently no trace of the perpetrators. There are no words in Het Laatste Nieuws about external characteristics such as skin color, but the young woman confirms to SCEPTR that the perpetrators were 4 young men with a dark, black skin color.

More Epstein tidbits

The Daily Beast covers the struggles that the original prosecutors had with Epstein's high powered defence team.

For the first time, the U.S. attorney who oversaw the Epstein prosecution in Florida’s Southern District is commenting publicly on the case, in a letter released exclusively to The Daily Beast.

...

 A Daily Beast examination into the inner workings of the Epstein defense strategy reveals how the fear and intimidation experienced by victims during pre-trial proceedings, combined with a ferocious, protracted campaign to undermine the prosecution.... culminated in a set of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist for the globe-trotting financier. 

...

Epstein had assembled a world-class legal team, including Alan Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and Roy Black (best known for having defended William Kennedy Smith against rape charges in Palm Beach.) 

...

“Defense counsel investigated individual prosecutors and their families,” seeking to unearth personal issues that might lead to disqualification of members of Acosta’s team. The defense also “often failed to negotiate in good faith. They would obtain concessions as part of a negotiation and agree to proceed, only to change their minds, and appeal the office’s position to Washington.”

There's a lot more in the article that is worth reading.

Interesting, isn't it, how many players in the Epstein circle are Jewish.

• His hedge fund's only financier, L. Wexner. 
• His legal team, including Dershowitz (who was a guest at pedo island). Ken Starr is not Jewish, as far as I can tell, but he is married to a Jewish woman.
• Barry Krischer, State Attorney who tried to get the entire matter dismissed.
• Ghislaine Maxwell, daughter of Ukrainian Jew (and financial scammer) Robert Maxwell.

Epstein was destabilizing currencies in support of Israel

Lew Rockwell has an interesting story on the Epstein scandal. Apparently Roger Stone wrote a book on the Clinton family in which the Epstein saga was covered. Among other tidbits not currently discussed:

Steven Hoffenberg, former owner of The New York Post, whom Stone interviewed, as saying Epstein “was manipulating currencies for the CIA. His pal Larry Summers hooked him up. He destabilizes Middle Eastern currencies to protect Israel. He’s protected.” 

Stone notes this treatment was indicative of the “Clinton-Bush alliance.” 

This information dovetails with recent articles by retired CIA Officer Phil Giraldi for the Unz review, the earliest piece titled “Did Pedophile Jeffrey Epstein Work for Mossad?” in which he noted: That Epstein was perceived as being intelligence-linked was made clear in Acosta’s comments when being cleared by the Trump transition team. He was asked “Is the Epstein case going to cause a problem [for confirmation hearings]?” … “Acosta had explained, breezily, apparently, that back in the day he’d had just one meeting on the Epstein case. He’d cut the non-prosecution deal with one of Epstein’s attorneys because he had ‘been told’ to back off, that Epstein was above his pay grade. ‘I was told Epstein belonged to intelligence and to leave it alone.’” 

Apparently if you do Israel's bidding, it is perfectly acceptable to be a pedophile. How interesting.

I guess it is some of that Tikkun Olam that they keep telling us about.

Is the UK going to eliminate writing portion of bar exam to help blacks?

Brilliant! The profession in which writing is absolutely vital is considering doing away with the writing component on the bar exam:

The first stage of the solicitors’ ‘super-exam’ could be entirely multiple choice after a piloting exercise found that the written section could place members of ethnic minorities at a disadvantage, the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has revealed.

The Solicitors Qualifying Exam (SQE) is a single assessment for qualifying solicitors, which is being developed by the SRA and assessment provider Kaplan for introduction in 2021.  

SQE1 – which candidates must pass before taking SQE2 – was due to contain a multiple-choice legal knowledge test and a written skills test. At a press briefing yesterday however, the SRA announced that it is considering scrapping the skills section. This would leave only the multiple-choice question paper. 

An independent review found the written skills assessment ‘raised significant concerns about reliability, fairness and standard setting’. The pilot suggested that black, Asian and minority ethnic (BAME) candidates, for example, were disadvantaged compared with white candidates even when their performance in the multiple-choice test was taken into account, according to the review.

Come now, we all know that Chinese and Indian students aren't disadvantaged. The issue is the blacks, pakis, and other low performing groups. 

Instead of putting pressure on these communities to be more assiduous in their bar exam preparation, the solution is to lower standards. Why bother with law school, perhaps they should get rid of them as well.

Kazakh man hacked with katana in diverse new Germany

Another day, another diversity incident:

A Syrian migrant who arrived in Germany in 2015 (thank you, Merkel) hacked a Kazhak-born German resident to death in the middle of a German street.

What benefit to Syrians bring to a society, exactly?

UPDATE:

Infowars has video of the attack, complete with terrified German women milling around. Those women are SHOCKED that this sort of thing happens in Germany!

Those same women might have asked what happens in the countries that the 'new Germans' are coming from. Hint: violence.

Train stations in Germany are home to a lot of crime

Another blast from the recent German past: migrants sentenced after beating a retiree at a train station.

German stupidity reaches new heights in case of train tossing murderers

It's hard to believe that Germans could be any more stupid, but they seem to up the ante every time I turn around. A short while ago, 'Germans' of foreign descent pushed three German boys in front of an oncoming train, killing two of them.

Prosecutors have stunned the country by charging them with 'bodily injury causing death'. They argue that the foreign youth had not formed an intent to kill, and that pushing them in front of a train was not foreseeable. 

Needless to say, Germans are outraged. (Not that they will do anything about it, of course).

In police hearings, the two young men detained in custody admitted they had pushed the youngster on the train - but by no means, to kill him, had both assured. After intensive investigations, in which 150 witnesses were interrogated, the prosecutors no longer assume a will to kill. For the two young men had not known that at the time of the crime a train passage was to be expected.

This is the German justice system. Obviously a train track is a dangerous place in which fatal injuries can occur. This is the reason that all train stations have signs that people are not to enter the track area.  

One might get the impression that the German prosecutors are deliberately avoiding more serious charges. Exactly what would satisfy them? A hand-written note stating that they were trying to kill the German victims?

How many deaths by train will Germans suffer before they begin to fight back?