Toxic masculinity is okay, so long as it isn't white

Here's an astonishing piece from the National Post, discussing a white woman who spent years living with an Amazonian tribe.

Ruth Thomson, a one-time Toronto debutante, who knew how to curtsy — and also handle a gun, ride a horse, and live life without modern amenities – spent over 50-years working as a missionary with the Kayapo, a remote Amazon tribe.

... 

The Kayapo had a reputation for killing foreigners who strayed into their territory. They raided other tribes and took captives. They were warlike and proud.

Well, that'd doesn't sound too inclusive and diverse, does it? It rather sounds like toxic masculinity and slavery.

Some of the men carried rifles — expropriated from dead Brazilians. Others had bows and clubs, perfect for killing wild pigs or bashing in an enemy’s skull. Their faces were brilliantly painted.  

Toxic masculinity indeed. Nary a word of complaint from the author so far.

She has narrowly escaped death by anaconda, witnessed a villager get his finger bitten off by a piranha and been asked to bury a dead Brazilian on a beach — after her Kayapo hosts murdered the man for straying into their lands. 

So they murder people who enter their territory. Hmm. 

“The Kayapo of the 1960s were like the Sioux Indians in the 1840s and 1850s,” says Barbara Zimmerman, director of the Kayapo Project for the International Conservation Fund of Canada. “The frontier was moving in and they were a warrior culture. They were still regularly killing people, and by killing people, I mean people they viewed as a threat or had somehow trespassed on their land. They are not killing people as much now, although they still do.”

Again, murdering people who encroach. Xenophobia, anyone?

Like most cultures, the Kayapo are inherently ethnocentric: They think they are the greatest culture on Earth.  

Wait, what??

Most cultures are ethnocentric? That's not what we are told when the topic is white nationalism.

Fifty years ago they didn’t wear clothes. Now they call Thomson on their cellphones. 

Okay, so what we have here is a group of murderous, xenophobic, racist cultural supremacists. The embody toxic masculinity in all of its forms. Warlike, proud, ethnocentric.

Yet, did you hear a note of condemnation? No, the author seems quite content to engage in euphemisms. If this were a white tribe, you would never hear the end of it.

Canadian Armed Forces might have 30 individuals with 'discriminatory views' in its ranks

A new story on how the Canadian Armed Forces might have 30 individuals with 'discriminatory views' in its ranks. The horrors.

[A] review found that between 2013 and 2018, about 55 members of the military were part of hate groups or had made statements and taken actions that “could be viewed as discriminatory.”

Could be viewed as discrminatory?? That would apply to anyone who thinks that Bruce Jenner isn't as feminine as a non-trans woman. The bar is so low these days that just about any racy comment would quality.

That would cover a range of activities, from an inappropriate comment in a barracks to espousing views on social media or in a chat room. 

 So you make a comment about illegal immigrants in a barracks, and suddenly you are an extremist.

An investigation last year by Radio-Canada found about 75 Armed Forces members were part of a private Facebook group associated with anti-immigration and anti-Islam views.

Criticize immigration and you are an extremist. What is this, Maoist China?

But [the useless military sock puppet being interviewed] again stressed that “good militaries aren’t racist.”  

Tell that to Israel. Or to Turkey. Or to Pakistan. Or to China.

He said extremist views are corrosive and undermine the military’s “warrior ethos” that is designed to “ensure cohesiveness and morale in combat.”

Criticizing immigration will undermine a unit's effectiveness in combat, but diversity (putting people together who have little in common) is fine.

“As we bring in people to the Armed Forces, I’m actively considering right now for the future perhaps a more robust beginning period, that before we teach you the military arts and virtues, we need to have a period of baseline acceptable behaviour, not just from the perspective of the Armed Forces, but just acceptable behaviour,” he said.

So basically, indoctrination before training.

Where do they find these idiots? Only a complete nitwit would maintain that enforcing political correctness is of paramount importance for combat effectiveness.

Who is behind the war on Christmas?

If you say "Jews", you are called an anti-semitic loony. The problem is, many Jews openly admit to trying to undermine the traditions of the (traditionally vast) Christian population of the West. Here's an example from NBC News by Lux Alptraum:

"I have never been a fan of Christmas."

Well, I'm not a fan of Chinese new year, but if I lived in China I wouldn't be trying to undermine their culture. 

"As a young Jewish child, I wrote a letter to my local newspaper arguing that Christmas trees in public schools were a violation of the separation of church and state."

Sure you did, but I bet you didn't protest against menorahs being displayed in public places. This isn't about secularism, I wager.

"What I do object to, however, is the culture that’s been built around Christmas, that has elevated one religious faith's year-end festivity into an inescapable, weeks-long period of compulsory celebration for nearly everyone."

No you don't. You'd have no problem with a compulsory celebration of diversity or inclusiveness or labor rights (e.g., May Day or Labour Day).

"December in America is a constant onslaught of Christmas culture "

That's because the USA has a predominantly Christian culture. If you live in Indonesia, expect to have predominantly Muslim holidays rammed down your thought. 

This woman claims to be speaking on behalf of legions of oppressed Muslims and Hindus, but I have never heard of a Hindu caring about Christmas. The fact is that Christmas is secular. Santa Claus does not appear in the Bible.

Jews have already effectively stripped most Christmas music and culture of its religious underpinnings. For example, "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer" has nothing to do with Christianity, being instead motivated by Jewish experiences of exclusion and mockery. The same can be said of nonsense like "I am dreaming of a white Christmas".

Objecting to the materialism and paganism of Christmas is rather rich, considering that Jews were some of the leading exponents of pushing materialism in order to strip Christmas of its religious meaning (i.e., the birth of the Saviour).

I'm not Christian, but this is as obvious as an airliner falling out of the sky. 

Toronto Star slant on resistance to global migration

A recent Toronto Star article shows the left-liberal spin on the UN Migration agreement:

"But the pact has incited protest, particularly in Eastern Europe, where a number of far-right groups and political parties have used the compact to fan public concern over a historic increase in the number of migrants and displaced people fleeing wars, persecution and violence in their home countries — or, in some cases, seeking better economic opportunities."

 Let's parse this carefully:

• "far-right groups": of course anyone concerned about migration is right wing. 
• "historic increase in the number of migrants": the wave of fighting-aged muslim men entering Europe is merely a 'historic increase'. As if there were hundreds of thousands of muslim men coming to Europe over the last 400 years.
• "displaced people fleeing wars, persecution and violence in their home countries": there are no wars in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Cameroon, Senegal, Eritrea, Ethiopia or Somali at present. Only a fraction of the migrants coming into Europe are from Syria or Libya.
• "or, in some cases, seeking better economic opportunities": these are called 'fake refugees'.

The Toronto Star can't bring itself to admit that:

• concerns over migration are well founded, given the massive rise in sexual violence in Europe (as well as the rise in terrorism).
• migrants are mooching off the welfare system, often returning home while claiming welfare payments.
• mass immigration has destabilizing effects on societies, as evidenced by the growing number of areas that are off limits to regular law enforcement.
• the majority of Europeans reject open borders.

Toronto Star howler on baby names in Ontario

Another day, another train wreck from the Toronto Star. A recent article on baby names contains some juicy tidbits:

"In Peel Region, where there is a booming Muslim population, Muhammad is number one."

Wonderful. Nothing helps a country become peaceful, cohesive and friendly to women like a booming Muslim population.

"[One mother] said for them, Muhammad “was more of a statement for us to know that you can still grow up here and live a very Canadian life, and have strong Canadian values, and there’s no opposition to having strong Islamic values” as well."

So here we have a recent immigrant lecturing us about 'Canadian values'. How nice. Note her claim that there is no incommensurability between Islamic values and Canadian ones.  (Hint: read the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights).

"...the new parents hope their first-born develops characteristics of compassion, “humility, and of course adherence to Islamic values and principles — and being of service to humanity,” like the founder of Islam."

Muhammed the slaver, who condoned the rape of female captives, was of 'service to humanity'.

"Rabia Khedr, executive director of the Muslim Council of Peel, said Muhammad, as well as Adam and variations on Noah (Nuh) are based on Judeo-Christian-Muslim traditions." 

So Rabia Khedr, whose ancestry in Canada goes back to 1973, tells us that there is such a thing as a "Judeo-Christian-Muslim" tradition.

Rabia Khedr is nuts. There is no "Judeo-Christian" tradition, let alone a "Judeo-Christian-Muslim" tradition.

Of course, the Star lets this nonsense slide without any form of questioning.

It's bad enough to see how the term "judeo-christian' was pushed post WW2. (Do a search for it on Google's nGram viewer). Now we have to put up with "judeo-christian-muslim".

odd story on 'gun manufacturing ring' in Ontario

The police have busted a 'gun manufacturing ring' in Ontario:

"Police said they’ve seized 14 handguns, six long guns including a machine-gun and an assault rifle, grenades, silencers, a stun gun and body armour. The guns were manufactured in Ontario using existing parts and then sold to southern Ontario criminals, police said."

14 hand guns is hardly an armory. In fact, it's less than the French police find at most mosques.

"The guns were sold for an average of $2,500 each to various criminal groups throughout the province"

What sort of idiot criminal spends 2,500 on a gun, when they can obtain a perfectly functional black market handgun for 700? It's not like they can shoot decently.

An odd statement, though:

"The guns were manufactured in Ontario using existing parts"

If they were merely assembled from existing parts, then they were not 'manufactured in Ontario'.

Assembly and manufacture are not the same thing. In this case, under Canadian law the key components of a handgun are probably regulated heavily. Meaning that they managed to get their hands on components from somewhere.

I'd be tracking down the method by which they managed to obtain the parts. If it is that easy to get parts, almost any idiot can follow a YouTube video showing how to assemble a full gun.

Creepy Indian doctor finally sacked by Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons

The Toronto Star reports that creepy South Asian doctor Suganthan Kayilasanathan has finally been stripped of his ability to practice medicine.

In typical South Asian fashion, he was exchanging his services for sex (likely with a white patient, since they seem to prefer them fair skinned):

"[He was found] guilty in September of sexual abuse and unprofessional conduct for having sex with a woman for whom he wrote two medical notes in the span of a week so she could skip exams."

Gamma male behaviour. Unable to attract a woman on his merits, he traded favors for sex. (Not to let the woman off the hook either).

Mr. Kayilasanathan is a regular in disciplinary matters, having been the subject of a rape allegation a short while ago. In that case, a young white woman had complained that he and another doctor had raped her while she was unable to consent.

(As in the UK, '#webelievevictims' does not apply when the alleged rapist is brown).

Low testosterine south asian doctors abusing patients is not an anomaly. Data from the UK has shown that Kashmiri, Pakistani (of course), Indian and Bangladeshi physicians are massively over-represented in sexual abuse of patients.

And guess who we are letting into the country on a massive basis? That's right.