Who is behind the war on Christmas?

If you say "Jews", you are called an anti-semitic loony. The problem is, many Jews openly admit to trying to undermine the traditions of the (traditionally vast) Christian population of the West. Here's an example from NBC News by Lux Alptraum:

"I have never been a fan of Christmas."

Well, I'm not a fan of Chinese new year, but if I lived in China I wouldn't be trying to undermine their culture. 

"As a young Jewish child, I wrote a letter to my local newspaper arguing that Christmas trees in public schools were a violation of the separation of church and state."

Sure you did, but I bet you didn't protest against menorahs being displayed in public places. This isn't about secularism, I wager.

"What I do object to, however, is the culture that’s been built around Christmas, that has elevated one religious faith's year-end festivity into an inescapable, weeks-long period of compulsory celebration for nearly everyone."

No you don't. You'd have no problem with a compulsory celebration of diversity or inclusiveness or labor rights (e.g., May Day or Labour Day).

"December in America is a constant onslaught of Christmas culture "

That's because the USA has a predominantly Christian culture. If you live in Indonesia, expect to have predominantly Muslim holidays rammed down your thought. 

This woman claims to be speaking on behalf of legions of oppressed Muslims and Hindus, but I have never heard of a Hindu caring about Christmas. The fact is that Christmas is secular. Santa Claus does not appear in the Bible.

Jews have already effectively stripped most Christmas music and culture of its religious underpinnings. For example, "Rudolph the Red Nosed Reindeer" has nothing to do with Christianity, being instead motivated by Jewish experiences of exclusion and mockery. The same can be said of nonsense like "I am dreaming of a white Christmas".

Objecting to the materialism and paganism of Christmas is rather rich, considering that Jews were some of the leading exponents of pushing materialism in order to strip Christmas of its religious meaning (i.e., the birth of the Saviour).

I'm not Christian, but this is as obvious as an airliner falling out of the sky. 

Toronto Star slant on resistance to global migration

A recent Toronto Star article shows the left-liberal spin on the UN Migration agreement:

"But the pact has incited protest, particularly in Eastern Europe, where a number of far-right groups and political parties have used the compact to fan public concern over a historic increase in the number of migrants and displaced people fleeing wars, persecution and violence in their home countries — or, in some cases, seeking better economic opportunities."

 Let's parse this carefully:

• "far-right groups": of course anyone concerned about migration is right wing. 
• "historic increase in the number of migrants": the wave of fighting-aged muslim men entering Europe is merely a 'historic increase'. As if there were hundreds of thousands of muslim men coming to Europe over the last 400 years.
• "displaced people fleeing wars, persecution and violence in their home countries": there are no wars in Pakistan, Bangladesh, Cameroon, Senegal, Eritrea, Ethiopia or Somali at present. Only a fraction of the migrants coming into Europe are from Syria or Libya.
• "or, in some cases, seeking better economic opportunities": these are called 'fake refugees'.

The Toronto Star can't bring itself to admit that:

• concerns over migration are well founded, given the massive rise in sexual violence in Europe (as well as the rise in terrorism).
• migrants are mooching off the welfare system, often returning home while claiming welfare payments.
• mass immigration has destabilizing effects on societies, as evidenced by the growing number of areas that are off limits to regular law enforcement.
• the majority of Europeans reject open borders.

Toronto Star howler on baby names in Ontario

Another day, another train wreck from the Toronto Star. A recent article on baby names contains some juicy tidbits:

"In Peel Region, where there is a booming Muslim population, Muhammad is number one."

Wonderful. Nothing helps a country become peaceful, cohesive and friendly to women like a booming Muslim population.

"[One mother] said for them, Muhammad “was more of a statement for us to know that you can still grow up here and live a very Canadian life, and have strong Canadian values, and there’s no opposition to having strong Islamic values” as well."

So here we have a recent immigrant lecturing us about 'Canadian values'. How nice. Note her claim that there is no incommensurability between Islamic values and Canadian ones.  (Hint: read the Cairo Declaration on Human Rights).

"...the new parents hope their first-born develops characteristics of compassion, “humility, and of course adherence to Islamic values and principles — and being of service to humanity,” like the founder of Islam."

Muhammed the slaver, who condoned the rape of female captives, was of 'service to humanity'.

"Rabia Khedr, executive director of the Muslim Council of Peel, said Muhammad, as well as Adam and variations on Noah (Nuh) are based on Judeo-Christian-Muslim traditions." 

So Rabia Khedr, whose ancestry in Canada goes back to 1973, tells us that there is such a thing as a "Judeo-Christian-Muslim" tradition.

Rabia Khedr is nuts. There is no "Judeo-Christian" tradition, let alone a "Judeo-Christian-Muslim" tradition.

Of course, the Star lets this nonsense slide without any form of questioning.

It's bad enough to see how the term "judeo-christian' was pushed post WW2. (Do a search for it on Google's nGram viewer). Now we have to put up with "judeo-christian-muslim".

odd story on 'gun manufacturing ring' in Ontario

The police have busted a 'gun manufacturing ring' in Ontario:

"Police said they’ve seized 14 handguns, six long guns including a machine-gun and an assault rifle, grenades, silencers, a stun gun and body armour. The guns were manufactured in Ontario using existing parts and then sold to southern Ontario criminals, police said."

14 hand guns is hardly an armory. In fact, it's less than the French police find at most mosques.

"The guns were sold for an average of $2,500 each to various criminal groups throughout the province"

What sort of idiot criminal spends 2,500 on a gun, when they can obtain a perfectly functional black market handgun for 700? It's not like they can shoot decently.

An odd statement, though:

"The guns were manufactured in Ontario using existing parts"

If they were merely assembled from existing parts, then they were not 'manufactured in Ontario'.

Assembly and manufacture are not the same thing. In this case, under Canadian law the key components of a handgun are probably regulated heavily. Meaning that they managed to get their hands on components from somewhere.

I'd be tracking down the method by which they managed to obtain the parts. If it is that easy to get parts, almost any idiot can follow a YouTube video showing how to assemble a full gun.

Creepy Indian doctor finally sacked by Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons

The Toronto Star reports that creepy South Asian doctor Suganthan Kayilasanathan has finally been stripped of his ability to practice medicine.

In typical South Asian fashion, he was exchanging his services for sex (likely with a white patient, since they seem to prefer them fair skinned):

"[He was found] guilty in September of sexual abuse and unprofessional conduct for having sex with a woman for whom he wrote two medical notes in the span of a week so she could skip exams."

Gamma male behaviour. Unable to attract a woman on his merits, he traded favors for sex. (Not to let the woman off the hook either).

Mr. Kayilasanathan is a regular in disciplinary matters, having been the subject of a rape allegation a short while ago. In that case, a young white woman had complained that he and another doctor had raped her while she was unable to consent.

(As in the UK, '#webelievevictims' does not apply when the alleged rapist is brown).

Low testosterine south asian doctors abusing patients is not an anomaly. Data from the UK has shown that Kashmiri, Pakistani (of course), Indian and Bangladeshi physicians are massively over-represented in sexual abuse of patients.

And guess who we are letting into the country on a massive basis? That's right.

Israel passes 'Jewish Nation State' law

Interesting article on Israel's new 'Jewish Nation State' law, which gives greater recognition to Jews than to other ethnic groups.

The Palestinian members of the Knesset, Israel’s parliament, were joined by Jewish liberal lawmakers and about 2,500 demonstrators on Saturday night, in a march through the main streets of downtown Tel Aviv to protest the bill.

A curious element in the discussions leading up to the bill's passage concerned ethnic segregation:

One clause in particluar, 7b, had attracted much concern from Israel's allies and even its president, Reuven Rivlin. Clause 7b would have allowed Jewish-only communities, and said the "state can allow a community composed of people of the same faith or nationality to maintain an exclusive community". 

Never fear, some commentators noted that the subsequent alterations were worse:

7b was removed, with the article concerning Jewish settlement changed to: "The state views the development of Jewish settlement as a national value and will act to encourage and promote its establishment and consolidation" 

Prior to the law’s passing, over 900 locales in Israel – approximately three-quarters of all townships in the country – already forbade non-Jews from living within their municipal borders. 

As an illustration of the attitudes in Israel, the article notes:

In recent weeks, a family of Palestinian citizens of Israel who purchased a home in the northern city of Afula was protested by hundreds of locals, including the former mayor, who told local press, “'the residents of Afula don't want a mixed city, but rather a Jewish city, and it's their right. This is not racism.”

How interesting.

It is not racism to oppose mixed cities (diversity).

That's not what Jews tell Europeans who object to being replaced by masses of third world migrants.

Rotherham-style rape gang discovered in Finland

According to a story on Iltahleti, 7 men have been arrested in Oulu Finland for sexual assault (gang rape) of a ten year old girl. The abuse took place over several months, making it equivalent to some of the stories of sexual slavery common to the U.K.

"Suspected sexual assaults have occurred in private homes in the Oulu area for several months."

This comes alongside another case in which a 20 year old 'foreign man' was caught raping two 14 year old girls.

The Finns were obviously too dumb to look at the U.K. and learn what danger they are putting their children into by importing men from primitive cultures.

Jews and other minorities suddenly anti-diversity when it impacts their kids

Typical. A wonderful article on the push to get more black and latino students into the higher tier NYC schools shows the utter hypocrisy of the Jewish and Democratic left. Instead of welcoming diversity, the parents (all of whom probably vote Democrat) are fighting against more diversity.

"DOE dispatched a senior official — Deputy Chancellor Josh Wallack — to one of its citywide presentations on a plan that aims to increase black and Latino enrollment at the primarily Asian and white schools by scrapping a single-test-score admission system."

Primarily Asian and White? This is 2018, schools like Stuyvesant are predominantly Asian.

“This proposal is nothing about education and all about division,” said objector Wai Wah Chin. “We are going to look at your race and say, ‘Oh, your parents cook the food, deliver it, they wash your clothes, but you can’t get in. Because we don’t like your race or national background.’ ” 

Yeah, well how do you think whites feel having to put up with discrimination via affirmative action?

“If this proposal is enacted, we are going to increase the racism and prejudice of our kids in the specialized high schools,” said NYU sociology professor and District 2 parent Jonathan Haidt. 

Oh look, a Jewish university professor suddenly telling us that diversity is not always good.

"He argued that black and Latino students admitted through modified entrance requirements would inevitably become stigmatized – and suffer for it."

How odd, that's the same argument used by Walter Williams, Thomas Sowell and other conservatives. Left wingers usually call such people 'racists'. Hmm.

"One parent, Sasha Rozenberg, asked the crowd for a show of hands of those who opposed the changes. With nearly every arm in the auditorium extended behind him, Rozenberg turned to look at Wallack. “Now a question for this administration,” he said. “What are you planning to do in the face of this overwhelming rejection of your proposal?”"

Nice, Sasha. There was overwhelming rejection of mass migration and forced school integration, but I don't recall Jews giving us an opt-out. Remember how your people have pushed the benefits of diversity on the rest of us?

So much for diversity. Jews openly brag about taking power in Colorado.

Lest you think that I am exaggerating, take a look at this recent article from Westworld about the degree to which Jews have locked down power in Colorado.

"it's not just the trifecta at the top of the Democratic ticket in Colorado; high-level figures, from statewide Democratic Party Chairwoman Morgan Carroll to Communications Director Eric Walker, along with a laundry list of behind-the-scenes Democratic operatives and state representatives, are also Jewish, an impressive feat for a relatively small religious minority. Approximately 102,000 Coloradans are Jewish, according to a 2017 estimate from the Jewish Virtual Library, or about 2.5 percent of Colorado's population — slightly above the national average of 2.1 percent."

So wait, a group constituting 2.5% of the population is now massively over-represented in government. This doesn't sound much like diversity, one of the constant tropes that Jews enjoy invoking. This looks a lot like ethnic racketeering.

Why should a group representing 2.5% of the population have so much power?

We are told that it is because Jews have a desire to 'improve the world', as if that disposes of the issue.

Rochdale council blocking an investigation into cover-up of child rapes

Apparently Rochdale city council is stonewalling an investigation into whether its leaders knew about the mass gang rape of children by Muslim men.

German police delay releasing info on rape of teenage girl by Afghans

As in the UK, the German police are prioritizing aslyum seekers over children. A 15 year old girl was dragged into a bathroom and raped by two Afghans. The police sat on the information for days:

"Police said they had not announced the incident closer to the time, fearing a backlash in the community."

They have found one of the perpetrators, but the other remains on the loose:

"Police arrested one man, named only as Mohammad F., 21, but say the other is still unaccounted for."

Of course, sitting on the information for days is extremely helpful when you are attempting to find the other Afghan rapist.  

Father of the year award

Goes to this German man, who left his daughter alone with an Iraqi 'refugee' only to have his daughter raped violently.

"The 22-year-old rapist came in contact with the girl after her father hired him for a job. The father wanted to support Germany’s refugee community by helping them integrate into the labour market."

Well, the father DID managed to support a form of 'integration'... the refugee's penis into his daughter's orifices.

"After they drank alcohol with another man, the Iraqi raped the girl after the man left. The incident happened on 29 October. Immediately after the incident, the young woman went with her parents to the police and reported the rape."

At least she didn't cover it up, like Selin Goren.

“This is very dreadful. This was a person whom I trusted.” the father said. His teenage daughter has sleeping problems and suffers from panic attacks.

You trusted a 22 year old muslim migrant to be around your teenage daughter.

This German is a complete idiot. Why would you trust someone you don't know, from a culture that is highly misogynistic??

"The police did not yet arrest the 22-year-old as there’s “no urgent suspicion” Lothar Gathen, spokesman for the prosecutor Mönchengladbach said on Thursday."

I am shocked, just shocked. German police not following up about a rape by a brown man.

The father should lose custody of his child. I fail to see the difference between this and letting a pack of hyenas babysit your cat.

The Toronto Star gleefully covers Algonquin College's new approach to increasing the number of female students in technical programs.

For the past decade, Kathryn Reilander would stand at the front of her classroom and survey her newest crop of students, struggling to find a female face in the crowd. Reilander is a professor at Algonquin College in Ottawa and every year in her electrical engineering technician program, she only sees an average of eight women in a class of roughly 200.

In response, the college is implementing a pilot project that will reserve 30 per cent of classroom seats for female applicants. In other words, playing with quotas for gender.

The initiative is part of a broader push by post-secondary institutions to close the gender gap in so-called STEM disciplines (science, technology, engineering and math), where women are woefully under-represented.

How odd. Women are massively over-represented in teaching, nursing, veterinary medicine, English literature, speech/language pathology and a host of other disciplines.

I don't see anyone at Algonquin finding ways of increasing the miniscule fraction of males in health-related programs.

Giller prize winner didn't do her homework

The latest in the left-wing conga line of Giller Prize winners is Esi Edugyan, who took home the gold with her acclaimed novel "Washington Black". The Giller Prize was founded by good mensch Jack  Rabinovitch in honour of his recently departed wife, Doris Giller.

The Giller Prize is always given out to books that exemplify the Jewish worldview - namely, the evilness of Christianity, the inherent goodness of diversity/multiculturalism, the ineluctable moral superiority of people of color (PoC) over Europeans, etc. Past awards have been given to books about the sordid abuse of children by Catholic priests. While I have no problem outright slandering the Catholic church, I notice that the Giller Prize committee is somewhat reticent about extending the same honors to books about abuse by Rabbis.

At any rate, "Washington Black" concerns a slave born into captivity in Barbados. The unfortunate young man is the property of a cruel slavemaster named 'Erasmus Wilde'.

And right there we lose all credibility.

The author apparently didn't do much research into the history of Barbados, nor into the owners of the large plantations on that island.

If she had done so, she would have figured out that the slave industry in South and Central America was in Sephardic Jewish hands. The odds of an 'Erasmus Wilde' owning a large plantation in Barbados are next to nil.

How convenient for the Jewish Giller Prize to go to a book that effectively covers up the complete dominance that Sephardic Jews had in the plantations of the Caribbean and South America.

Not to mention that the first slaves on Barbados were actually white, the unfortunate souls who lost the war against Cromwell and the Puritans. Life expectancy for whites in those climates was around a year, due to disease. The white slaves of Barbados are probably unknown to the author.

At any rate, well played. I'm sure the middle-aged white cat ladies will engage in an extra dose of self-flagellation, thinking about cruel 'Erasmus Wilde' and all of the torments he imposed on his charges. Meanwhile, Jews are victims with no history of oppressing people of color.

German police covered up migrant rape of blind woman

Junge Freiheit reports that the German police in Chemnitz did their best to censor reports of a brutal rape of a severely visually impaired woman by a migrant. The victim was accosted and raped twice in a hallway by a Syrian migrant.

Buzzfeed India story on how white-run Indian village is paradise compared to India cities

Interesting piece from ultra-soy-infused Buzzfeed on how a village founded by white expatriates is an environmental and ecological paradise. At first I thought it was a joke, but it appears to be authentic.

The opening teaser was what threw me:

"While urban Indians like me run our own home into the ground, the 50%-foreign community of Auroville has turned barren land into a lush forest."

Founded by hippies, the community is only 50% foreign these days. She interviews Johnny Allen, an Australian who moved to India 50 years ago.

The village was originally a parched wasteland (perhaps thanks to the French and British):

"When Johnny arrived in 1971, he found a terrain so barren, so scorching, that fisherwomen from the closest village had to tie plastic bags around their feet to cross the sand with their catch. Between the ocean and the next village, where they got the best price for fish, there was exactly one tree. They would pause there for shade before blistering onward."

 The author (Indian herself) notes the contrast:

"I joke to Johnny that if India is still habitable 50 years from now, he’ll be one of the people to thank for it. It’s a joke, but it also isn’t. Six of the world’s ten most polluted cities are in India. Delhi, our capital, and Mumbai, where I live, are tarring children’s lungs. Forests are being cut down to clear paths for highways around the country, and very few Indians, including myself, can bring themselves to care about it in a sustained way.

But while urban Indians like me run our own home into the ground, the 50%-foreign community of Auroville has successfully reforested 5,000 acres of land and turned barrenness into a lush forest..."

There we have it, an honest declaration that Indians don't give a crap (pun intended) about the environment.

Perhaps this is a good reason to not let massive numbers of them into other countries, where they can continue to over-produce children and turn the forests into slums.

Toronto Star spouts nonsense about the failed amazon HQ2 bid

The propaganda hucksters at the Toronto Star are back with their feel-good, 'light on facts' content generation. This time they are trying to convince us that losing the Amazon HQ2 bid has made Toronto stronger.

“This list of 20 finalists was not really a list (of candidate cities) for HQ2,” or a second Amazon headquarters, said Richard Florida, the U of T urbanist who helped craft Toronto’s bid, in an interview Tuesday.

Really? Why didn't you say that at the outset, Richard?

Toronto Global chair Mark Cohon expressed no regrets about a bid that emphasized the Toronto area’s deep and growing tech talent pool, its cluster of world-class colleges and universities, the city’s cosmopolitan charms and the corporate financial advantages of public health care.

Corporate advantages of public health care?

There are some major DISADVANTAGES to public health care. In the USA, health care plans are provided through one's employer. This means that it is hard to transfer companies at times (or take time off of work to upgrade education) on account of the irritating nature of the US health insurance 'market'.

Yes, health plans cost employers money, but they also make it difficult for employees to leave their jobs.

Brendan LaCerda, the New York-based lead analyst for Canada with Moody’s Analytics, told the Star the Toronto bid had lots going for it — but there are challenges in asking Seattle-based staff to move to Canada. 

“I think that ultimately what might have compromised Toronto’s chances is, maybe, Amazon’s concern was getting tech workers, people with those skills, to move to the area,” LaCerda said. 

“You can’t seed those new offices completely with new talent — significant management people and staff would have to move. I think the concern is that they were going to have to ask people from the United States to move to Canada, and that might have presented (legal and other hurdles) that Amazon didn’t want to face.”

This is total nonsense:

1. There are no 'legal hurdles' to Americans working in Canada. There is something called the TN visa, which makes it easy for professionals to cross the border.
2. Living costs and quality of life are also major issues, with Toronto being far more unaffordable.
3. Washington State has no state income tax. Ontario has high income taxes.

The real issue is the border itself. Amazon did a study of Toronto years ago and concluded the international border was a major problem.

Also not discussed by these geniuses: the PR effect of locating a head office of a major US-based firm in Canada. Amazon's customers would have been angry.

No, instead of sober analysis we get fluffy 'feel good' nonsense. Typical of the Star.

Toronto fails to land Amazon HQ2, brags anyway

As detailed in the execrable Toronto Star, the Mayor of Toronto managed to use the loss of the Amazon HQ2 contest as an excuse to brag about his increasingly overpopulated and crime ridden city:

“Our city is booming and this process has allowed us to tell that success story — the story of our tech industry and our ability to foster that industry — around the world,” Toronto Mayor John Tory said in a statement. “There is no other place in North America which can boast all in one location the same talent, the same quality of life, the same vibrancy and economic strength.”

The idea that Toronto has the same technical 'talent' as Silicon Valley or New York is laughable. I would even put it far behind Chicago, which is stocked with high speed trading firms.

Toronto has very little in terms of elite software development firms. There's a noteworthy but small A.I. research group called the "Vector Institute", but most of Toronto's offices for companies like Facebook and Google are staffed with sales and account management types, not engineers or scientists.

(Contrast that with Waterloo, which has actual engineering offices).

Silicon Valley clearly has better quality of life (e.g., weather, disposable income for tech workers). 

The term 'vibrancy' is a nonsense term thrown in there to make his comparison less ridiculous. 

• Is Toronto more 'vibrant' than New York? 
• What does that term mean anyhow? It is a stand in for 'diversity'? 

As for economic strength, the idea that Toronto is 'stronger' than NY or Silicon Valley is laughable.

Note that all of these regions have relatively high taxation. Toronto's main advantage on Chicago is less violent crime (for now), and weather. Toronto has zero advantages on New York or Silicon Valley, as far as I can tell. Tech workers have health care provided by their employer, so the mediocre Canadian health care system is not a huge advantage for people working at Amazon or similar companies.

New study on German attitudes towards foreigners

The folks at Suddeutsche Zeitung are sounding the alarm about the growing xenophobia and anti-semitism of Germans. The latest study (Leipziger-Autoritarismus-Studie") from the University of Leipzig interviewed 2416 people in  Germany about their attitude towards foreigners.

Some results about foreigners in general:

• 24% of Germans have a negative attitude towards foreigners.
• 36% of Germans agree with the statement that foreigners only come here to take advantage of the welfare state.
• 25% would send foreigners back to their homeland, when jobs in Germany are scarce.
• men in all categories surveyed score higher than women.

Are these really shocking? Would Chinese, Japanese, Koreans, Saudis or Pakistanis be any better when asked about these issues?

It seems to me that the German response is actually quite muted and passive in comparison to most countries. Most populations do not want foreigners entering their territory, going on welfare, and taking scarce jobs. We are, after all, a tribal species. I'd love to see similar questions asked of Saudis or Israelis.

With respect to Muslims:

• 44.1 percent of respondents think that Muslims should be prohibited from immigrating to Germany
• The proportion of those who "feel like a stranger in their own country because of the many Muslims" also increased in 2018

This tells me that 56% of Germans are either Muslims or naive beyond belief. Not wanting your country to turn into an Islamic nation (as predicted by the German government itself) is completely healthy.

With respect to Jews:

• anti-Semitism is widespread

The authors of the study conveniently do not give us statistics on just who is anti-semitic. I am sure the legions of Afghans, Turks, Arabs, Somalis (etc) are completely in love with Jews, and the horrible white Germans are to blame.

Half of all German welfare recipients are of a migrant background

An article in Die Welt discusses the massive burden that migration places upon the German welfare system. A German Federal Employment Agency (BA) reports shows that there has been a 69% increase in welfare recipients of 'non German' background in the last 8 years.

Who would have thought that allowing millions of unvetted, illiterate, unskilled and unemployable people into an economy would have negative effects on the welfare system?

Oddly enough, there are 259,000 Turkish welfare recipients. The 'gastarbeiters' (guest workers) don't actually work. 

Note: 

• the welfare numbers do not include asylum seekers who are still waiting for a final decision on their welfare claim.
• the welfare numbers might not include asylum seekers who have been denied asylum but who are still receiving some form of benefits

This is why Asians are desperate for charter schools

WorldStarHipHop.com has a great selection of videos showing violence in schools. Here's a good example of two black students attacking a white teacher, who is undoubtedly going to quit teaching at this school when she gets back from leave:



SMH: 2 Female Students Jump A Female Teacher In Class!

Police chief in Freiburg warns women not to drink alcohol

Moving one step closer to Sharia, the police chief in Freiburg has warned women to avoid being intoxicated in order to reduce their risk of sexual assault.

"Don’t make yourself vulnerable by using alcohol or drugs,” Freiburg’s police chief Bernhard Rotzinger said."

How nice. Victim blaming. Women can drink safely in Japan, Singapore, or Korea.

In fact, they used to be able to drink in Germany.

A few questions:

• What changed to make Germany dangerous?
• When will 'slutwalk' protest Rotzinger?
• Should women simply dress in burkas?

Melbourne Islamic terror attacker shot and killed

Melbourne police have shot and killed a 31 year old Somali who went on a typical 'truck of peace' ramming and stabbing rampage.

There is video on the news website. Looks like the attacker was moving slowly, using the reverse 'ice pick grip' in a naive manner. It's a good thing too, as the police officers looked completely unprepared to deal with edged weapons.

The killing shot was landed by a police officer who was backing up with his weapon completely extended. If you watch the video, he is lucky that he didn't trip. (Walking backward in an urban environment is a bad idea). 

At any rate, I have yet to hear one single positive aspect of allowing Somalis into other countries. They really don't do anything other than have children and engage in rape or other forms of serious crime.

German TV segment on the massive increase in rape in Freiburg

German TV reports (somewhat disingenuously) on the rise of sexual violence in Freiburg. Once a calm university town, Freiburg is now the site of numerous attacks against women.

TV crews interviewed young women on the street and found that not a single one felt safe in the city anymore. "Things have gotten worse in the last couple of years", one woman stated.

Despite this, the TV station was at pains to make sure that migrants are not blamed. "Some of the perpetrators are of German nationality", the 'reporter' declared.

German nationality? Hans and Jens are out there committing gang rapes? 

Why would ethnic Germans suddenly be committing more rapes in the last few years? Climate change? 

Of course, we all know that the men involved are third world trash from places like Syria, Afghanistan and Pakistan. That's what they do when they get to the west, as the women of Rotherham can attest to.

Swedish couple suffers brutal torture and sexual assault in their own home at the hands of migrants

The latest brutal sex attack in Sweden involves a home invasion that turns into a torture session. According to Expressen, the couple was brutally raped and tortured for four hours by a pair of home invaders.

Of course, the newspaper is reluctant to point out that these are not ethnic Swedes involved in invading homes and torturing people.

Another interesting aspect of the story:

For a country with strict gun control, Sweden has an awful lot of problems with migrants carrying handguns. (Also hand grenades). 

How is it that so many poor impoverished migrants manage to source weapons? My guess is that a decent pistol would go for 700+ euros, minimum. 

Sweden has been noticing increased shipments of illegal weaponry into the country for at least 10 years. They seem awfully disinterested in asking WHY there is an uptick in weaponry. The common claim is that it is 'gangs', but are ethnic Swedes suddenly joining gangs and acquiring weapons?

The Huffington Post's pet Syrian migrant columnist facing sexual assault charges

The Huffington Post's smug Syrian columnist Aras Bacho is facing multiple charges of sexual assault on women in Germany. Also published by Vice, Bacho has been a consistent apologist for crimes by migrants in Europe.

This is the rocket scientist who tweeted that German women are to blame for sexual assaults by migrant men. The reason? Because the women are unaccompanied. I suppose they should be wearing burkas, accompanied by male relatives.

Of course, feminists group gave him a pass on this rather obvious victim blaming.

It appears that he couldn't keep his own hands to himself. Five women have accused him of sexual assault. I don't expect the '#metoo' and '#believevictims' crowds will have much to say.

Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society is big business

From a story on the Social Contract website about the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society ("HIAS"):

"According to its 2017 IRS records, the group grossed $45,910,121, and shelled out a whopping $20,686,120 in salaries and benefits for HIAS employees..... Mark Hetfield is pulling down a salary package worth $336,323 running this charity, Rita Silverman, in charge of grass roots organizing, earns $299,335 in pay and benefits, and Farhan Irshad, the Chief Operating Officer, collects $198,450 in wages plus $51,842 in benefits"

Sounds like quite the altruistic bunch at the top of HIAS.

Note: Remind me to look up whether the Catholic and Protestant immigration groups are any different.

"Investigative reporter Jim Simpson (see page 24) notes that HIAS has received $186 million from the U.S. Treasury in the last ten years."

18.6 million USD a year in taxpayer contributions.

"In 2017, Uncle Sam donated $24,493,763 in taxpayer dollars to the organization. Curiously, last year the contributions from the public added up to $17,361,702 — underwriting just 80 percent of the group’s payroll — making the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Society employees government welfare recipients."

French press reports that harassment of women in immigrant enclaves is getting rapidly worse

New article from LeParisien discussing the situation with sexual harassment in immigrant heavy areas of Paris.

In May 2017, a group of residents of the Chapelle-Pajol district wrote a petition, which quickly became viral, entitled "Women, an endangered species at the heart of Paris ".

Said one woman:

"The situation has worsened... since these men are more and more numerous. Like many others, I gave up taking the metro to La Chapelle, to cross the square ... Even at a running pace. Between sexist or gritty remarks, rustling, unpleasant looks and fear of aggression, I capitulated....The police are more present, it's true, but the fights are also more and more numerous and violent."

Numerous French media outlets have reported that women are disappearing from the nightlife of Paris. They do not go out to cafes or restaurants in the evening. Many stay at home for fear of being attacked.

I wonder what could have changed in the last few decades. 

Radically transform Canadian politics to eliminate hate speech

An odd essay on the Toronto Star website by Les Scheininger discusses racism and extremism. In discussing his Jewish father, he remarks:

"He witnessed and endured the state-sanctioned racism which Jews faced daily in Eastern Europe."

What state-sanctioned racism? I think the time period in question is 1930-1939. 

• Perhaps he is talking about Poland? What state sanctioned racism was there in Poland? Jews were massively over-represented in the merchant classes and in the more affluent professions. They were, as in Prussia, the bulk of international merchants and bankers. Is he speaking of quotas in Universities?
• Is he talking about the Soviet Union? Probably not, as it appears the family fled TO Russia and not away from it. The Cossack pogroms against the Jews in Russia are examples of anti-Jewish violence, but they cannot be what he means.
• Anti-Jewish racism in the Soviet Union is dubious during this time period. In fact, anti-semitism was made into a crime by the disproportionately Jewish Bolsheviks. Stalin kept that policy, although he attempted to reduce Jewish influence within the government.

The whole article is rather light on concrete examples, and heavy on hand-waving.

"In the summer of 1941, as the German army was approaching, my father gathered family members together and with them, my parents and older brother, who was 3 at the time, escaped to Russia and found themselves in Uzbekistan."

The Soviet government was transferring large numbers of Jews from areas east of Germany (e.g., Poland) into its interior at the time, so this makes sense.

"My father was immediately torn from his family and taken to a labour camp in Siberia. He toiled, as did so many others, in indescribable conditions. He never had the loving pleasure of seeing and holding his daughter, who was born shortly after he was taken away and who did not survive through infancy."

Why was he taken away exactly? Why would a Jewish refugee be placed in a gulag?

Given that tens of millions of Christians and Muslims died in a gulag system that (according to Solzehnitsyn) was largely run by Jewish commandants, I'm not sure why we are supposed to believe that the gulags were particularly awful to Jews.

Note also: "he toiled, as did so many others". This sleight-of-hand seems to be designed to convince us that the gulags were full of Jews. In fact, the majority of gulag inmates were Christians. 

"When the war ended, Jews began searching for their loved ones, and with the help of the Hebrew Immigrant Aid Service...my father was among the fortunate ones reunited with their families. HIAS facilitated housing in a displaced persons’ camp in Steyr, Austria, where I was born."

So because he is grateful to HIAS, we should all be grateful to HIAS.

"my father maintained, articulated and imparted to my brother and me a fundamental philosophy that Jews should be able to live in liberty and safety anywhere on this planet, and not be restricted — as they had been for centuries — by discriminatory state decree, despots and bigots to ghettos or outlying communities."

A few questions:

• why do Jews claim a right to be able to live in Japan or China without restriction?
• do indigenous people have no right to be able to exclude foreign populations?

I completely disagree with this.

• Jews might be interested in open borders, but it does follow that other people have to embrace them on that basis.
• Why is it racist and bigoted to refuse Jews access to a country, but Arabs born in Palestine cannot return and live in Israel?

This is redolent of Hillaire Belloc's observation about Jewish attitudes to immigration:

"He is, in his own view, only saved from the disadvantage of a latent hostility when he is thus protected, and he is therefore convinced that the world owes him this singular privilege of full citizenship in any community where he happens for the moment to be, while at the same time retaining full citizenship in his own nation."

The remark about ghettos is odd. The Jewish population in Poland lived in isolation from their Christian neighbours voluntarily. They had zero interest in interacting or mixing with the Poles and Belorussians, whom they regarded as stupid and inferior. (A common epithet was 'pig' or 'goy'). Intermarriage was punished heavily. Any perusal of books on Jewish life in Poland would confirm this. In contrast, the Jewish population in Germany had a significant proportion that was integrating with the rest of German society.

"To him and many others, who have endured adversity and hatred in many areas of the world, Canada and the United States represented the ideal of what they desired for their families and descendants."

Odd that there is no mention of the Zionist movement, which was a major impetus in the relocation of Jews in Russia to Palestine.

"We know that that there is no panacea. There will always be, among us, a segment of society that harbours hatred against others who they view to be different." 

Indeed, like the > 50% of Israeli Jews who would like to expel the Arab population of Israel. Or the Chabad Lubavitchers, who believe that gentiles are inferior. No mention of either of those.

"We now need effective, strong political leadership and the will to move beyond words to deliver the message that hate-mongering will no longer be tolerated."

Well, you could have started with the Imam in downtown Toronto who was caught preaching Jew-hatred. I guess he wasn't important enough.

"we require pressure from our communal leaders to call for prosecutions and for our political leaders to direct our law enforcement officers to investigate, lay appropriate charges against, and prosecute those charged"

Why should 'communal leaders' have any say in law enforcement matters? For that reason, why should political leaders be able to direct law enforcement? The separation of powers has proven to be somewhat useful in allowing the development of societies that at least have a semblance of the rule of law.

"The present dangers are so much greater than in the past."

Apparently it is even worse than 1939 these days.

"In years before, those charged with these offences were viewed as fringe personalities having little influence on most of us"

David Ahenekaw comes to mind, as does Ernst Zundel. It is fair to say that these are not mainstream individuals with any great media exposure.

"...but causing sufficient concern that they not be viewed as role models, so they were charged criminally. Today, these types of individuals are prominent through social media, are running for office and in some cases being elected internationally."

Eastern Europeans (and Koreans) are rejecting mass immigration, and they are electing politicians who will represent their views (e.g., Victor Orban). None of them are as xenophobic or ethnocentric as the typical Israeli politician.

"attention must be given to the political and government arenas and those who have influence within. It is often forgotten that our elected leaders have real responsibilities, not only to develop policies and pass legislation, but to be role models demonstrating values and principles."

The role of political leaders in a representative democracy is to govern with the consent of the electorate. It is not to be 'role models' in demonstrating values and principles. It makes one wonder what tradition this fellow came out of, since his view of politics is at odds with typical western notions of liberal democracy.

" It is now necessary for political parties to develop effective processes to ensure individuals who seek to be nominated and elected as representatives of a party and receive its endorsement truly believe in the party’s policies, values and philosophy, and promote them"

So goodbye to representative government and the preferences of constituents in a given riding.  How does one reconcile this with either representative democracy or an interest in 'diversity' and 'inclusion'?

"Canada would be in a unique position with its values, history and experience to provide global leadership to combat expressions of bigotry and racism, assuming the further appropriate steps, as noted, are also taken."

Why is Canada in a 'unique position'? France, Sweden and other countries are also experimenting with mass immigration.

" It is clear that the scourge of neo-nationalistic hatred is an international problem requiring co-ordination and co-operation among countries."

Great, let's start talking about Israel. How many Palestinian women and children have been killed by Israel in the last few years? Shhh, they don't count.

"We no longer have borders, let alone walls, when it comes to communications. "

But Israel has a physical wall.

"Canada has now established its credentials of being ahead of the pack on a number of new, progressive and creative movements and initiatives."

Not really. The UK is far ahead of Canada when it comes to criminalizing speech, and we can see how that is working out. Left wing MPs estimate that up to a MILLION English girls have been gang raped by Muslim rape gangs, who have been aided by Police and Social Workers who would rather not be called 'racist'.

So here we have a person writing an article that fails to provide key details or data of any sort. On the basis of hand waving, they are urging major changes to our political system, including:

• complete party discipline, whereby MPs are not allowed to deviate from the party line
• the ability of the government to direct law enforcement
• the abdication of any form of representative democracy

The shaky stories about the gulags are there for emotional impact, and the double standard of Jews maintaining a violent ethno-state in the Middle East is nicely swept under the rug.

Interesting post over at Euro Canadian that accurately diagnoses some of the problems with European women:

"There was a time that I thought your sex had a primary purpose. But then the news came out that Canada's Total Fertility Rate was 1.5 in 2017, 0.6 below replacement level. That is, for every set of 1000 Canadian women, there are 1,492 births. So obviously nature made a mistake. You aren't here to help perpetuate our species after all. You are not here to keep our tribe alive. No, instead your job is to aid rival tribes, to favour out-groups, to form an alliance with The Other, to push for open borders, to support and encourage migrants and refugee claimants to settle here, undercut white males and let imported women do the job that you were supposed to do. Thanks to your careerism, the political class now has an ironclad excuse to increase immigration intakes to keep population level up and our people down. In effect, we have outsourced child-bearing and rearing to third world migrants from failed states whom we expect to perpetuate our civilization and culture despite having little connection to it."

Let's pull that apart:

• European women no longer have children. 
• European women lack in-group preference.
• European women actively seek to import people from tribal societies into their territories.
• European women undercut males of their own ethnic group.
• European women have outsourced reproduction to third world immigrants.

There is merit to each and every one of these claims. For instance, the European female's lack of interest in motherhood is most pronounced in Germany, where a staggering number of ethnic German women have no intention of reproducing.

These left wing women will be in for a shock when they inevitably become a minority in their own ethnic homelands. They are about to discover the following truth:

"Just because you have abandoned tribalism, it doesn't mean that other groups think the same way." 

Sweden Democrats shocked to find out their youth wing has been Islamized

Interesting article from Sputnik that discusses the consternation evidence among members of the Social Democrats at the news that their youth wing has been turning towards radical Islam. Among other actions, the youth wing has:

• called Islam a "universal solution against human suffering, diseases and problems existing today" 
• expressed homophobic and anti-Semitic sentiments
• substituted the traditional Internationale anthem played at a party conference with an Islamic song. 
• dismissed atheism as an "amoral idea"

The news story interviewed one of the former leaders of this youth division:

According to Carolina Pettersson, former district secretary of SSU Skåne, the "fundamentalist phalanx" has roots in Rosengård, Malmö's immigrant-heavy district. According to her, they came to power using aggressive methods and intimidation. Petterson blamed the rise of groups that don't share the party's ideology on a weakened labor movement with a higher tolerance for clans and ideological digressions.

Perhaps it is the translation, but this is a word salad. What do the following mean?

• 'weakened labor movement'
• 'higher tolerance for clans'
• 'ideological digressions'

So the traditional labor base of the left-leaning Sweden Democrats is being diminished in favor of Islamic activism. 

What about 'clans'? This seems to imply that large extended family/tribal units are collaborating to lock down political power.

If you have followed my posts about Germany, you'll know that Arab clans control the organized crime in German cities. Their power is so great that they openly mock German police.

So we have clans growing in power and influence, taking over mainstream political parties.

Sounds like quite a recipe for a stable, progressive society. 

New York Review of Books and Jian Ghomeshi

The left wing mobs have come for the editor of the New York Review of Books, which decided to publish a rambling article from disgraced CBC star Jian Ghomeshi, who had been accused by multiple women of severe sexual assault (including violence). 

Ghomeshi was known as a creep from his days as a student activist at York University. His odd behavior with women was the subject of much gossip in the Toronto entertainment scene, and numerous women spoke of being warned about spending time alone with him. 

The Persian Prince of the CBC was even accused of sexual harassment on the job, claims that were ultimately settled out of court (and for which Ghomeshi uttered a public apology). There is good evidence that the CBC knew about his habits, but they covered the matter up in order to keep one of their only stars.

Ghomeshi is the ultimate beta male, a weak chinned male feminist who took gender studies courses at university in order to ingratiate himself with women. Despite the public persona that exuded feminism at every turn, his true attitudes to women emerged when he had them at his disposal in private surroundings. 

The New York Review of Books published a mea culpa article by Ghomeshi, who had been acquitted of charges of sexual assault in a riveting criminal trial. This enraged the left wing enough for Ian Buruma, the NYRB editor, to be ousted from his job. 

As an act of penance, the magazine then followed up with a piece that collected letters from numerous concerned individuals. The Toronto Star notes that the NYRB may have suffered fairly lasting damage to its reputation, despite the firing of Buruma and the attempts to ameliorate the situation by including numerous rebuttals.

Judge Napolitano shows why the libertarian left is ruining their country

Although I'm generally a fan of Judge Napolitano on many issues, his latest essay on the 'migrant caravans' crossing Mexico is quite disappointing in its naivete. Like most of the left, he seems to believe that humans are interchangeable, and that millions of Africans and Mexicans can be transplanted into the USA successfully provided that they are willing to work and integrate.

Sadly, this is not the case. He's a classic example of how libertarians are breeding their own ideology into oblivion.

"Nationalism and its cousin nativism are dangerous attitudes that have come and gone almost cyclically throughout American history. They foster an arrogant aura about Americans who embrace them — we are more deserving than you because our ancestors got here before you or yours did — and they cause fear and hatred of foreign-born people."

Napolitano would be quite surprised to learn that the U.S. Constitution seems to imply nativism. Just read the preamble ("secure the blessings of liberty to ourselves and our posterity"). Also:

• Japan, Pakistan, Israel (cough cough), China, Korea, Saudi Arabia and a host of other countries are nativist in this sense. 
• It is not clear that these are 'dangerous' attitudes, given that Japan and Korea are the most functional, socially cohesive, safe and prosperous nations on earth.
• Why shouldn't the descendants of those who fought in the Revolutionary War (or WW1/WW2) have greater claim to being American?
• What evidence is there that nationalism causes fear and hatred? 

"They also lull one into the lazy mental habit of judging the moral worth of people not on the basis of their personal choices and fidelity to first principles but on the basis of their membership in groups marked by immutable characteristics of birth, such as people’s place of birth."

• The only 'immutable' characteristic listed is 'place of birth'. In Napolitano's world, there is no such thing as IQ, disease susceptibility (e.g,. Tay Sachs, sickle cell), infectious disease exposure, etc.
• Why do only 'immutable' characteristics count? What about partially mutable ones like homophobia, misogyny, or general cultural traits (e.g., honor-based norms of dispute resolution).

Like most commentators, Napolitano is unaware of the difference between judging individuals and judging populations. The law of large numbers implies that samples tend to take on the characteristics of the population they are drawn from as they get larger. We might not be able to judge a single Syrian, but we can certainly draw inferences about the sort of people that we will get when we import 50,000 of them.

Import 50,000 people from a low IQ country that suffers from high levels of birth defects due to inbreeding (e.g., Pakistan), and you get a horde of immigrants with low IQs and high levels of birth defects. Pakistanis in the UK (when they aren't raping young white children), are marrying their cousins.

"This habit rejects a founding American principle that we are all created equal and endowed by our “Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.”

Our judge has apparently read a 'right to immigrate' into the Constitution. 

Furthermore, people are not created equal in the sense of possessing similar talents, proclivities, physical characteristics, or cultural norms. When considering immigration, these characteristics are of the utmost importance, which is why the US immigration system used to keep track of how immigrants from various countries performed.

"And natural law teaches that human rights come from our humanity — not from the government — and they adhere in everyone, not just Americans."

There is no natural right to migrate.

"I have argued in this column that the right to travel is a natural right, even though it was not until 1969 that the Supreme Court recognized it as such. "

Travel and immigration are two very different things. One changes a society permanently.

"And the Constitution itself, from which all federal powers derive, does not even delegate to the federal government any power over immigration — i.e., who can come here. It just gives it power over naturalization, i.e., who can become a citizen here."

Wait, so this is a division of powers issue now? That just pushes the issue to the state governments, and doesn't really address the issue of natural rights.

"people who want to work should be allowed in. "

Why? No reasons given?

Only an idiot believes that there is only a single issue in any given policy debate. As a judge, Napolitano should know about policy analysis, including such notions as 'minimal impairment'. Are there truly no other interests at stake? Here's a suggestion:

• the interests of existing citizens in determining who is eligible to become a member of their society
• the interests of workers in controlling the amount of foreign labor entering the market
• the interests of the federal government in controlling the yearly intake of new citizens. (Napolitano seems to forget that the children of these temporary non-naturalized workers are deemed US citizens).
• national security interests
• public health interests, particularly relating to the spread of communicable diseases
• the interests of women who will suffer sexual abuse at the hands of migrants from misogynistic cultures (e.g., the mass attacks in Cologne, or the massive child rape problem in the UK).
• the interests of homosexuals who will be on the receiving end of violence from homophobic migrants (e.g., the Pulse nightclub).

Immigrants change the culture of their new nation. This is particularly true of immigrants with high birth rates, such as Arabs, Somalis, Pakistanis, and Mexicans.

Many of these immigrants come from cultures that are tribal and honor-based. This leads to major problems when these people enter a culture based on dignity and the rule of law. Many others (e.g., Hindus) come from countries riddled with corruption.

Napolitano is naïve enough to believe in the 'magic dirt' theory: that any person transplanted to the USA can become American if they wish. He believes that people steeped in tribalism or collectivism are going to integrate into American society. At the same time he condemns 'nativism', he doesn't seem to have much concern for tribalism, identity politics and in-group preferences among the migrants.

He seems to be unaware of the large number of third world migrants engaged in fraud, such as the Somalis in Minnesota who are sending 10+ million USD a year back to Somali through the airports. This money was stolen from US taxpayers through phony child daycare schemes. Let's not even mention the refugees and immigrants who sign up for welfare benefits and then high-tail it back to their own countries.

"The Wall Street Journal have demonstrated indisputably that most of the work that immigrants will do is work most Americans eschew. "

Bull. First, the WSJ is biased and full of political hacks who believe in open borders. Second, the Center for Immigration Studies and other proper research institutes have challenged this claim.

"Their work not only benefits them but also produces family stability and increases wealth, which finds its way into the stream of commerce."

Family stability? In the USA? What's the Hispanic single parenthood rate?

Increases wealth? Has Napolitano never heard of remittances?

Notice the concepts here:

1. benefits to the migrants
2. family stability (presumably the migrant families)
3. increases in wealth (whose?)
4. the stream of commerce

Nowhere do we find any consideration of the impacts on Americans, including workers who are competing for these unskilled jobs. 

"We who call ourselves Americans are nearly all descended from immigrants."

Immigrants are those who move from one society to another. A person who arrives in a country with no infrastructure and who builds that infrastructure is a 'settler'.

Even if his claim were true, it does not follow that a country must always and forever welcome immigration. The fact that there were immigrants in the past does not imply that there cannot be quality control and quotas in the present.

"Yet when our forebears arrived here, they were met simply by prejudice and government indifference."

The early colonists were met by government indifference? Which government?

Sadly, Napolitano has revealed himself to be a charlatan on the subject of immigration. Not only is he completely incompetent at policy analysis, but he is dripping with contempt for the interests of current citizens and permanent residents.

It is interesting that Mises, Rothbard, Rockwell and Hoppe (all libertarians) do not agree with open borders. Mises was at pains to emphasize the importance of culture, for instance. Napolitano merely ignores culture altogether, as if it makes no difference.

A basic question for the Judge:

"Why do you think that a philosophy of liberty, property rights, and the rule of law will survive the mass immigration of people from cultures that do not believe in any of these?"